Gay Marriage ProCon Charts For Science

Mildred Loving the joint plaintiff along with Richard Loving in the landmark civil rights case of Loving v Virginia in 1967 which struck down all state bans on interracial marriage in the United States issued a statement on the 40th anniversary of ruling in 2007. Since July 9 2015 married same-sex couples throughout the United States have equal access to all the federal benefits that married opposite-sex couples have.[144] One of the largest scale uses of social media to mobilize support same-sex preceded and coincided with the arrival at the U.S Supreme Court of high-profile legal cases Proposition 8 and the Defense of Act in March 2013 The "red equals sign" project started by the Human Rights Campaign was an electronic campaign primarily based on Facebook that encouraged users to change their profile images to a red equal sign to express support same-sex [89] At the time of the court hearings it was estimated that approximately 2.5 million Facebook users changed their profile images to a red equals sign.[90] Ultimately I think the Equal Protection Clause does guarantee same-sex in all fifty states But as you know courts have always been strategic There have been times where the stars were aligned and the Court like a thunderbolt issues a ruling like Brown v Board of Education but that's pretty rare And given the direction of society the Court to have allowed the process to play out the way it has may make the shift less controversial and more lasting. Cambodia: · 50 communes Costa Rica Israel Japan: · 7 cities Poland San Marino United Kingdom: · Cayman Islands

The NAACP the veteran African-American civil rights organization has pledged its support rights and same-sex stating that they "support equality consistent with equal protection under the law provided under the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution".[84] In 2017 according to a Public Religion Research Institute state-by-state poll there was majority support same-sex in 44 states plurality support in 4 states plurality opposition in 1 state and majority opposition in 1 state.[63] Continual polling by Gallup has shown that support same-sex has grown rapidly while opposition has collapsed In 1996 68% of Americans opposed same-sex while only 27% supported In 2018 67% of Americans supported same-sex while only 31% opposed.[64] Compared to similarly situated opposite-sex married couples same-sex couples faced the following financial and legal disadvantages: Same-Sex couples face the same financial constraints of legal as opposite-sex married couples including the penalty in taxation.[209] While social service providers usually do not count one partner's assets toward the income means test welfare and disability assistance the other partner a legally married couple's joint assets are normally used in calculating whether a married individual qualifies assistance.[209] On J the Supreme Court ruled by a 6-3 vote in the case of Pavan v Smith that under their decision in Obergefell same-sex couples must be treated equally to opposite-sex couples in the issuance of birth certificates In December 2016 the Supreme Court of Arkansas upheld a state law only allowing opposite-sex couples to be automatically listed as parents on their children's birth certificates while prohibiting same-sex couples from being allowed the same on an equal basis The Supreme Court summarily reversed the Arkansas Supreme Court finding that the disparity in treatment was a violation of their decision in Obergefell.[181] The Population Reference Bureau reported that by October 2015 486,000 same-sex s had taken place in the United States It estimated that 45% of all same-sex couples in the country were married.[227] In June 2016 one year after the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Obergefell v Hodges Gallup reported that nearly 1 million U.S adults were in same-sex s.[228] In June 2017 Gallup estimated that 10.6% of American LGBT adults were married compared to 13.6% of heterosexual adults Prior to Obergefell 7.6% of LGBT adults were married.[229] I believe all Americans no matter their race no matter their sex no matter their sexual orientation should have that same freedom to marry  I am still not a political person but I am proud that Richard's and my name is on a court case that can help reince the love the commitment the fairness and the family that so many people black or white young or old or straight seek in life I support the freedom to marry all That's what Loving and loving are. A Washington Post-ABC News poll from February–March 2014 found a record high of 59% of Americans approved of same-sex with only 34% opposed and 7% with no opinion.[54] In May 2013 a Gallup poll showed that 53% of Americans would vote to establish same-sex in all 50 states Three previous readings over the course of a year consistently showed support at 50% or above Gallup noted: "Just three years ago support was 44% The current 53% level of support is essentially double the 27% in Gallup's initial measurement. Sorry we just need to make sure you're not a robot best results please make sure your browser is accepting cookies.

In 2009 a pair of economists at Emory University tied the passage of state bans on same-sex in the US to an increase in the rates of HIV infection.[220][221] The study linked the passage of same-sex ban in a state to an increase in the annual HIV rate within that state of roughly 4 cases per 100,000 population. Officials of nine counties in two states Texas and Alabama are still unwilling to issue licenses to same-sex couples as of June 2017 Those wishing to marry within the state must travel to another part of the state in order to obtain a license However some counties may require at least one person to be a resident of the county in order to receive a license.[175] When a U.S district court invalidated the Calinia referendum that ended same-sex s there in 2008 mer Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich said it showed "an outrageous disrespect our Constitution and the majority of people of the United States who believe is the union of husband and wife".[131] By the end of 2012 Gingrich was prepared to accept civil—but not religious—same-sex s and encouraged the Republican Party to accept the fact of same-sex was certain to become legal in more and more states.[132] The most prominent supporters of same-sex are human rights and civil rights organizations as well as the medical and scientific communities while the most prominent opponents are religious groups The ruling of the Supreme Court in Obergefell occurred following decades of consistently rising national public support same-sex in the United States with support continuing to rise thereafter. The most prominent opponents of same-sex in the United States have been The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints the Catholic Church (represented by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops) the Southern Baptist Convention and the National Organization The legal issues surrounding same-sex in the United States are determined by the nation's federal system of government in which the status of a person including marital status is determined in large measure by the individual states Prior to 1996 the Federal Government did not define ; any recognized by a state was recognized by the Federal Government even if that was not recognized by one or more states as was the case until 1967 with interracial which some states banned by statute. A CNN poll conducted on Febru found that 63% of Americans believed s and lesbians have a constitutional right to marry up from 49% in August 2010.[52] A Washington Post-ABC News poll conducted from April 16 to 20 2015 found that 61% of Americans supported allowing s and lesbians to marry legally.[53] Prior to 2004 same-sex was not permed in any U.S jurisdiction It was subsequently legalized in different jurisdictions through legislation court rulings,[137] tribal council rulings,[138] and popular vote in referenda.[139][140][141] Note: This table shows only states that licensed and recognized same-sex s or had legalized them bee Obergefell v Hodges It does not include states that recognized same-sex s from other jurisdictions but did not license them. Some 7,400 companies were offering spousal benefits to same-sex couples as of 2008[update] In states that recognized same-sex s same-sex couples could continue to receive those same benefits only if they married.[212] Only 18% of private employers offered domestic partner health care benefits.[210] According to the Federal Government's Government Accountability Office (GAO) in 2004 more than 1,138 rights and protections are conferred to U.S citizens upon by the Federal Government; areas affected include Social Security benefits veterans' benefits health insurance Medicaid hospital visitation estate taxes retirement savings pensions family leave and immigration law.[143] Several psychological studies[214][215][216] have shown that an increase in exposure to negative conversations and media messages about same-sex creates a harmful environment the LGBT population that may affect their health and well-being. One study surveyed more than 1,500 lesbian and bisexual adults across the nation and found that respondents from the 25 states that have outlawed same-sex had the highest reports of "minority stress"—the chronic social stress that results from minority-group stigmatization—as well as general psychological distress According to the study the negative campaigning that comes with a ban is directly responsible the increased stress Past research has shown that minority stress is linked to health risks such as risky sexual behavior and substance abuse.[217] At the Perry v Schwarzenegger trial expert witness Ilan Meyer testified that the mental health outcomes s and lesbians would improve if laws such as Proposition 8 did not exist because "when people are exposed to more stress they are more likely to get sick " and that particular situation is consistent with laws that say to people "you are not welcome here your relationships are not valued." Such laws have "significant power". United States case law regarding same-sex : The Supreme Court decision legalizing same-sex in the states and territories did not legalize same-sex on Indian lands In the United States Congress (not the federal courts) has legal authority over Indian country Thus unless Congress passes a law regarding same-sex on Indian tribes federally recognized American Indian tribes have the legal right to m their own laws.[182] As of the time of the Obergefell ruling 24 tribal jurisdictions legally recognize same-sex Some tribes have passed legislation specifically addressing same-sex relationships and some specify that state law and jurisdiction govern tribal s As of November 2017 same-sex is legally recognized in 40 tribal jurisdictions. In an interview on The O'Reilly Factor in August 2010 when Glenn Beck was asked if he "believe(s) that is a threat to [this] country in any way" he stated "No I don't I believe that Thomas Jefferson said: 'If it neither breaks my leg nor picks my pocket what difference is it. The Human Rights Campaign the largest rights organization in the United States states that "many same-sex couples want the right to legally marry because they are in love — many in fact have spent the last 10 20 or 50 years with that person — and they want to honor their relationship in the greatest way our society has to offer by making a public commitment to stand together in good times and bad through all the joys and challenges family life brings."[83] Two other studies examined personal reports from LGBT adults and their families living in Memphis Tennessee immediately after a successful 2006 ballot campaign banned same-sex Most respondents reported feeling alienated from their communities The studies also found that families experienced a kind of secondary minority stress says Jennifer Arm a counseling graduate student at the University of Memphis.[218] The Supreme Court's ruling in Obergefell renders moot any remaining legal challenges as it specifically orders states to both issue licenses to same-sex couples and to recognize as valid s permed in other states.[142] Supporters of the legalization of same-sex have successfully used social media websites such as Facebook to help achieve that goal.[85][86][87] Some have argued that the successful use of social media websites by LGBT groups has played a key role in the defeat of religion-based opposition.[88] Based in part on research that has been conducted on the adverse effects of stigmatization of s and lesbians numerous prominent social organizations have issued position statements supporting same-sex and opposing discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation; these organizations include the American Psychoanalytic Association and the American Psychological Association.[213] During the 2008 presidential election campaign Republican vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin stated: "I have voted along with the vast majority of Alaskans who had the opportunity to vote to amend our Constitution defining as between one man and one woman I wish on a federal level that that's where we would go because I don't support "[130] A study by the Columbia Mailman School of Public Health found that men in Massachusetts visited health clinics significantly less often following the legalization of same-sex in. The United States of America is the most populous country in the world to have established same-sex nationwide The funding of the amendment referendum campaigns has been an issue of great dispute Both judges[96][97] and the IRS[98] have ruled that it is either questionable or illegal campaign contributions to be shielded by anonymity.